Teeteto o Sulla scienza

The dialogue questions what it truly means to know something, which feels surprisingly relevant today. Did anyone else find their perspective on understanding shifting as they read?

The way Socrates questions Theaetetus is intense and thought-provoking, but sometimes it felt like it kept circling without clear answers. How did others interpret this approach?

Plato's use of dialogue makes abstract concepts more relatable, but I wonder if this was a deliberate choice to make philosophy more accessible or a reflection of his teaching style.