Il lupo di Wall Street

His recounting of events is so outrageous that I wonder what parts are true and what might be dramatized for effect. Does anyone else question the accuracy of the more unbelievable episodes?

He’s clearly deeply flawed, but his charisma and success make it hard not to be captivated. How do readers reconcile enjoying his story with knowing the damage he caused?

The vivid depictions make the story immersive but also raise questions about whether it glamorizes the excess. Did these details enhance or detract from the overall message?