La rivincita sciita. I conflitti interni all'Islam e il futuro del Medio Oriente

The book offers a nuanced perspective on religious divisions, but I'm curious what motivated the author to highlight these internal debates over more visible external conflicts.

The way the book connects past and present helped me understand the complexity, but I wonder if others found it accessible or overwhelming.

The selection of examples felt very deliberate, but I'm interested in knowing what guided the choices — was it based on impact, availability of sources, or something else?