GUERRA SENZA ODIO

It offers a rare glimpse into his inner thoughts, but I wonder how much of it was curated or edited by the editors. How do readers feel this impacts the authenticity of his voice?

His actions during the war seem complex, and I found myself questioning the line between duty and morality. Was this explored enough in the book?

This collection sheds light on his personal perspective, but I’m curious whether it changes how readers interpret his role compared to other military leaders of the era.