Apologia della storia o Mestiere di storico

Bloch's insights seem to stem from a deep passion for understanding how history is constructed. I wonder if personal experiences or historical debates influenced this focus.

The book's exploration of what constitutes 'history' made me rethink how I interpret historical sources. Would love to hear if others felt the same way.

The detailed techniques described could really impact classroom approaches. Do educators incorporate these ideas, or are they more suited for scholars?