L'illusione di Dio: Le ragioni per non credere

I wonder if specific events or personal experiences motivated him to challenge religious beliefs through this book. Was there a particular catalyst for its publication?

His arguments are sharp and direct, but I sometimes wondered if that approach might alienate readers rather than encourage dialogue. What do others think?

The way complex ideas are broken down is impressive, but I’m curious whether this clarity makes the book more impactful or oversimplifies some concepts.