Si prega di fumare

The satire feels both hilarious and pointed, making me wonder how much of that tone was planned from the start or evolved during writing.

His manipulative tactics are hilarious but also uncomfortable — I’m curious whether readers see him as a hero, anti-hero, or something else.

The way the protagonist spins truths and half-truths is so relevant today; I wonder if the author drew from specific real-world examples or crafted it from imagination.