La verdad sobre el caso Harry Quebert de Joël Dicker

The shifting viewpoints kept the suspense high and added layers to the mystery. I wonder if this approach was planned from the start or developed during writing.

The story's momentum seemed to fluctuate, but maybe that was intentional to deepen character development. Would love to hear others' thoughts on how it affected their engagement.

The characters' choices felt complex and sometimes conflicting, which made me question who was truly right or wrong. Did others find themselves sympathizing with characters they initially disliked?