Killing for Company

Masters' detailed exploration of Nilsen's mind is both fascinating and unsettling. I'm curious what drew him to this aspect of the case and how he approached understanding such a complex individual.

The book spends a lot of time on the procedural aspects, which can feel slow but also add depth. Was this deliberate to build suspense or to provide context for the crime?

There are so many details in the book—some seem crucial, others more background. I wonder what guided the choices about what to highlight and what to omit.