Guerre giuste e ingiuste. Un discorso morale con esemplificazioni storiche

The selection of examples felt deliberate and powerful, but I wonder what guided his choices. Were these stories meant to challenge specific moral beliefs?

The book weaves complex moral debates with real-world cases, but I’m curious if the historical examples always aligned with Walzer’s arguments or if some felt out of place.

Considering the current geopolitical climate, I wonder what motivated him to revisit these issues and how he hopes this work influences contemporary debates.