Gli intellettuali, vizi e misfatti di una classe in una straordinaria galleria di personaggio da Rousseau a Fassbinder

The diverse range from Marx to Chomsky offers a broad perspective, but I'm curious how the author decided who to include and who to omit.

Some personalities felt nuanced, while others seemed painted in a certain light. How do readers interpret the author's approach to bias?

Understanding the time periods and events surrounding these intellectuals might change how we see their ideas. Did the book help clarify these connections?