Facundo. Civiltà e barbarie

The dichotomy feels both provocative and complex. I wonder what historical or personal influences shaped this stark contrast.

The vivid descriptions really brought the social divides to life, but I was also uneasy about how stereotypes were presented. How did others interpret this portrayal?

His personal history as an educator and reformer seems to color his arguments. I'm curious about what aspects of his life led to such strong opinions.