Sherlock Holmes e il mostro dell'East End

Seeing the Ripper murders through Watson's eyes adds a fresh layer of intimacy and professionalism. I wonder what led to this creative choice and how it shaped the narrative.

The rich depiction of Victorian London really immerses the reader, but I found the story a bit slow in parts. Was that intentional to build tension or just a side effect of the detailed setting?

I'm curious about the balance between historical accuracy and creative license. Did the author have to make significant changes for narrative flow or character development?