Dietro i candelabri

Thorson's memoir dives deep into their private life, but I'm curious what motivated this intimate approach over a broader biography. Did he want to challenge the typical glamorized narrative?

The book captures both the glitz of Liberace's world and its underlying struggles. I wonder if this duality resonated with other readers or felt conflicting.

His personal experience offers a unique lens, but I wonder how much of this is subjective versus factual, and how that influences our understanding of Liberace.