Lo dirà il mare

The book delves into complex courtroom procedures and evidence, but also keeps the suspense alive. I wonder how much of that was driven by the case itself versus the author's narrative style.

The case was so layered and ambiguous at times, making me question whether justice was truly served. Would love to hear others' thoughts on the credibility of the evidence.

The storytelling style made the events feel more immediate and personal, but I'm curious what motivated that choice compared to a traditional nonfiction account.