Climat, la part d'incertitude

His background in physics and data analysis seems to influence his skeptical approach. I'm curious what motivated him to delve into this controversial topic.

The book makes some bold claims about costs and benefits, but I wonder how much of that aligns with broader economic research. How did others interpret these arguments?

Balancing technical accuracy with readability is tough. I'm interested in whether Koonin planned this level of detail from the start or adjusted as he went.