Pour le pire

The shifting viewpoints added layers of suspense, but I wonder if that was always the plan or if it evolved during writing. Did it help build the tension or make the plot more confusing?

The pacing of revelations kept me hooked, but I also wondered if revealing certain truths too early might lessen the suspense. What was the goal behind the timing of these reveals?

The exploration of trust and deception felt very personal and thought-provoking. I’m curious whether the author drew from real psychological cases or crafted this from imagination.