Les manuscrits de Jérusalem (Les Archives secrètes du Vatican t. 5)

The intertwining of real history and fiction keeps the story compelling but also makes me wonder how much research went into it. Did the author aim for historical accuracy or take creative liberties?

I loved the richness of the historical detail, but at times, the story felt a bit slow. Was this intentional to build atmosphere or a challenge of balancing info with suspense?

The secretive nature of the archive adds so much intrigue. I’m curious if this choice was based on real features of the archive or purely fictional imagination.