Le codex d'Alep : L'étrange destin d'un manuscrit sacré (Broché)

The narrative intertwines history and personal obsession, making me wonder how the author chose which stories to highlight. Was this approach planned from the start or developed during research?

Learning about its history made me think about the importance of preserving cultural artifacts. I'm curious if others felt a personal or emotional link to the stories behind it.

The book weaves through various timelines and perspectives—what do you think led to the choices about what to emphasize or leave out?