Faire taire le passé: Pouvoir et production historique

The book explores various overlooked stories—what do you think guided the author's choices in emphasizing certain histories over others?

The idea that history isn’t just discovered but made and silenced by power structures made me rethink what I know about the past. What parts of this perspective resonated most?

The interdisciplinary approach felt very intentional, but I wonder what led to this particular blend of fields and ideas.