Sexual Politics : la politique du mâle

Her background clearly shaped her arguments, but I wonder which specific moments sparked her most provocative ideas. Did anyone feel a particular chapter resonated more personally?

It's often cited as a pivotal work, but I’m curious how it’s viewed by those who came after—does it still feel revolutionary today or more historical?

While groundbreaking, some perspectives might be challenged or seen as limited now. Did anyone else notice areas where the book’s ideas have evolved or been critiqued?