Sans l'ombre d'un doute (Mickey Haller t. 7)

Connelly's mastery of courtroom drama is evident, but I wonder how he balances technical accuracy with pacing to keep readers hooked.

His decisions often blur the line between right and wrong, making me question what I would do in his position. Is this a reflection of real moral ambiguity in law enforcement?

The courtroom scenes feel so authentic — I'm curious whether the author drew from personal experience or extensive research to craft this backdrop.