Poussière de Lune

Stephen Baxter's hard science fiction is impressive, but I wonder what inspired him to balance technical accuracy with storytelling—was it a personal passion or research-driven?

The story has intense moments, but the detailed science parts made me lose some momentum. Do others think this was necessary to build tension or a distraction?

The characters’ struggles felt both realistic and inspiring. I’m curious whether Baxter intentionally aimed to highlight hope amid catastrophe or if it evolved naturally.