Paix des peuples, guerres des nations

The book spans multiple continents and cultures, which adds depth but also complexity. I'm curious whether this was driven by the author's personal experiences or a deliberate editorial decision, and how it shaped the overall narrative.

The book ties past and present together, but I wondered if some readers might find the historical sections dense or slow. How did others connect these lessons to today's geopolitical climate?

With so many global hotspots and topics, selecting what to emphasize must have been challenging. I wonder what criteria influenced the focus on certain themes over others.