Homme invisible, pour qui chantes-tu ?

The narrative voice feels intimate and raw, making the reader feel inside the protagonist's mind. I'm curious whether this approach was planned from the start or evolved during writing.

The ending is open and thought-provoking, but I wonder if Ellison intended for us to draw our own conclusions or if there's more behind that final scene.

The metaphor feels timeless, but I’m interested in how current readers interpret the protagonist's invisibility in today's society.