TOUT CE QUI EST MAUVAIS EST BON POUR VOUS

The argument flips the usual narrative of media being mindless. I wonder what research or experiences led Johnson to this conclusion.

While the book makes a compelling case, some parts made me wonder if there's a risk of overlooking genuine concerns about media influence.

The selection of shows, games, and media feels deliberate, but I'm curious whether these were chosen because they are truly representative or for illustrative effect.