Jusqu'à la fin et au-delà

The book presents history as a lively debate rather than a fixed narrative. I'm curious what inspired this approach and how it influences our understanding of history.

The mix of fantasy and history created a unique tone, but I wondered if this blurred the lines for some readers or added a layer of depth.

The different viewpoints added richness but also complexity. Was this a reflection of real historical debates or a deliberate narrative device?