What inspired the author to focus on non-sororic logic in this book?
Around the Web·el mes pasado
La conversación entre lectores ya está abierta. Un autor verificado puede sumarse después de reclamar este perfil.
What inspired the author to focus on non-sororic logic in this book?
Did anyone else find certain fallacies more relatable to everyday arguments than others?
How do you think this book changes the way we spot logical errors in media and conversations?