Narco en la frontera: adolescentes al servicio de los zetas / Narco on the Border

Their personal stories made the chaos feel more immediate, but I'm curious what led to that narrative choice versus a broader overview.

The details felt so vivid and real, but it made me wonder how much of it is based on interviews versus research. What impact did that have on the storytelling?

Their stories seem so unique yet representative of a larger issue. I wonder what drew Dan Slater to these particular lives and this moment in history.