Por qué el budismo es verdad: La ciencia y flosofía de la meditación y la iluminación

The book seamlessly blends psychology and spirituality, but I wonder what motivated the author to frame meditation and enlightenment through a scientific lens.

Some sections offered clear exercises, while others felt dense. I'm curious if others tried applying these methods and how it worked for them.

The selection of research felt very intentional, highlighting certain aspects of human nature. Was this based on personal interest or a particular narrative goal?