How did the choice to tell the story as an oral history impact the emotional depth?
Around the Web·el mes pasado


La conversación entre lectores ya está abierta. Un autor verificado puede sumarse después de reclamar este perfil.
How did the choice to tell the story as an oral history impact the emotional depth?
Did anyone else find the multiple perspectives added to the sense of chaos?
I wonder what led the author to focus so heavily on the aftermath rather than the outbreak itself?