El caso del patito que se ahogaba

The legal details felt very realistic, which added to the suspense. I wonder what research or experiences influenced his depiction of courtroom drama.

The clues were subtle but rewarding, making me question everything I thought I knew about the case. Was the resolution satisfying for others?

His deductions stood out, but sometimes it felt like he was pushing the boundaries of plausibility. Did others find him a bit over-the-top or perfectly charismatic?