El caso de Cristo

Lee Strobel's background as a reporter shapes the narrative style, but I'm curious what motivated him to dive into apologetics through this method. Did his personal journey influence the structure?

The book compiles various historical and scientific arguments, but I wonder how different readers interpret the strength of this evidence—does it sway skeptics or reinforce faith for believers?

It seems designed to challenge doubts but also to strengthen conviction. I'm interested in hearing whether it feels accessible and persuasive across different perspectives.