Plan of Attack

The book digs deep into the decision-making process, but I wonder what drove the author to emphasize these aspects. Was it based on new sources or a desire to highlight overlooked details?

The intricate descriptions of diplomatic negotiations and military planning added layers I didn't expect. Did this change how others viewed the lead-up to the invasion?

Balancing transparency with confidentiality must have been challenging. I’m curious about the process behind sourcing and verifying the details shared.