Cuerdos entre locos: Grandes experimentos psicológicos del siglo XX

The book presents some of the most famous and controversial studies in psychology. I'm curious what motivated the author to focus on these experiments and how she selected them.

Many of these studies pushed boundaries and raised serious moral questions. How do others feel about the way these experiments were conducted and their lasting impact?

Slater intertwines history, psychology, and personal reflection. I wonder if this narrative style made the material more accessible or if it sometimes blurred the line between fact and interpretation.