Octubre: La historia de la Revolución rusa

His focus on the political intricacies and personal stories made the history feel alive. I'm curious about what motivated this particular angle.

The complexity added richness but also made it hard to follow the main narrative. Did others feel the same or did the author clarify the factions well enough?

I'm wondering if Miéville offers a unique perspective or interpretation that sets this book apart from more traditional histories.