Cristianismo: Caso Resuelto

The analogy of investigation and evidence is compelling, but I'm curious how much of this perspective was a conscious choice from the start versus evolving during writing.

The use of investigative methods made the arguments feel tangible, but I wonder if it resonates more with skeptics or believers alike.

The selection of specific events and evidence shapes the narrative — I’d love to know what guided those choices and if other claims were considered.