Im Zeichen des Drachen

Clancy's descriptions of military operations are so vivid, but I wonder if that slowed down the story or added to the tension. Was this a conscious choice to keep readers engaged while educating them?

The negotiations and political maneuvers seemed very streamlined, which made me curious whether Clancy based this on real-world diplomacy or if it was meant to serve the plot more than accuracy.

The title uses these powerful animals to represent nations, but I wonder if there was a specific reason behind choosing these animals or if they carry a deeper symbolism for the characters' relationships.