Das Kamel ohne Höcker

The book incorporates both Swedish and other linguistic elements, which felt very authentic. Did anyone else feel this added depth or made it harder to connect?

The shifting viewpoints really emphasized the complexity of the characters' experiences. I wonder if this narrative choice was planned from the start or evolved during writing.

The conclusion left me with a lot to think about regarding the characters' futures. Was this open-endedness satisfying, or did it leave others wanting more closure?