Dogmatik im Grundriss

His approach feels so deliberate and accessible—I'm curious whether he aimed to make complex theology more approachable or if there was another motivation behind this structure.

Some sections made me pause and reflect deeply, while others felt dense. I'm wondering if readers with a background in philosophy had an easier time engaging with the material.

It seems to break down complex ideas into manageable parts, but does it also risk oversimplifying or fragmenting the theology? Would love to hear others' thoughts.