Kopenhagen: Stück in zwei Akten

Focusing on just Copenhagen creates a sense of claustrophobia and intimacy. I wonder if this was to heighten the moral tension or for practical reasons.

The characters' memories and perspectives seem so layered that it's hard to tell what's real. Did this make anyone else question their own understanding of history?

The division feels deliberate, emphasizing the contrast between the characters' conflicting memories. I’m curious whether this structure was chosen to mirror the complexity of their moral choices.