Blood Oath

The story feels very grounded in real investigative work, but I wonder how much was driven by research versus narrative flow. Did the focus on procedure come at the expense of deeper character insights?

Some characters' choices seem questionable, which adds complexity but also raises questions about justice. How did others interpret the moral landscape Fairstein created?

The atmosphere feels very specific and immersive, making me curious whether the setting was based on real locations or historical events that the author wanted to highlight.