What inspired the author to focus on non-sororic logic in this book?
Around the Web·上个月
读者讨论现在已开放。认证作者认领此资料后可以加入。
What inspired the author to focus on non-sororic logic in this book?
Did anyone else find certain fallacies more relatable to everyday arguments than others?
How do you think this book changes the way we spot logical errors in media and conversations?