我們從未現代過

His argument that we've never truly been 'modern' made me rethink the boundaries between science, politics, and culture. Did anyone else find this perspective as provocative as I did?

His method of blending anthropology with philosophy was fascinating but also complex. I wonder what led him to develop this unique framework and how it influences current debates.

I found myself questioning the objectivity of scientific knowledge after reading. Did anyone else feel that the book made science seem more intertwined with social constructs than expected?