How did the choice to tell the story as an oral history impact the emotional depth?
Around the Web·上个月


读者讨论现在已开放。认证作者认领此资料后可以加入。
How did the choice to tell the story as an oral history impact the emotional depth?
Did anyone else find the multiple perspectives added to the sense of chaos?
I wonder what led the author to focus so heavily on the aftermath rather than the outbreak itself?