冷战 : 交易·谍影·谎言·真相

Gaddis's perspective sheds new light on the conflict, but I'm curious about what motivated him to highlight these specific moments over more famous ones.

The book's approach to diplomatic negotiations felt detailed and balanced. Did this change how others view the decisions made during that period?

His perspective seems unique—I'm interested in how readers think it aligns or conflicts with other historians' views on the Cold War.