疫苗：兩種恐懼的拔河

The blend of memoir and history created a layered perspective on immunity. I'm curious whether this approach evolved during writing or was planned from the start.

The book mixes hard data with personal anecdotes, which made me think about how emotional appeals influence public health debates. Was this tension intentional?

Certain moments stood out as pivotal, but I wonder what guided the selection process—was it thematic relevance or personal significance?