以色列：一个民族的重生

He manages to cover a complex and contentious history in a way that's accessible without oversimplifying. I'm curious about what motivated this particular approach.

Given the ongoing debates around Israel's history, I wonder how the author navigated different narratives and whether readers felt it was fair.

With so much history to cover, the choices about what to include or exclude must have been tough. What do you think guided those decisions?