吉檀迦利

Translating poetry, especially such revered works, involves choices that can change the tone and impact. I'm curious what motivated this particular approach and how it differs from previous versions.

Some poems felt deeply personal and meditative, while others seemed more universal. I'm wondering if others experienced a similar sense of intimacy or if it felt distant.

The setting and cultural references add layers of meaning. I'm interested in how the translator balanced preserving authenticity with making the work accessible to a global audience.