贝克特全集.17:终局

The sparse setting feels like a deliberate reflection of the characters' internal emptiness. I'm curious whether this simplicity was meant to focus the audience more on the dialogue and ideas.

The play's conclusion is so open-ended that it almost feels like a mirror to life's unresolved nature. What interpretations did others take away from the final scene?

Beckett's work always feels rooted in existential questions, but I'm interested in what personal or philosophical influences shaped 'Endgame'.